Model outputs from the study "Can atmospheric chemistry deposition schemes reliably simulate stomatal ozone flux across global land covers and climates?""

10.26165/JUELICH-DATA/PGVBVGEmmerichs, TamaraTamaraEmmerichs0000-0002-0165-9574Max Planck Institute for MeteorologyModel outputs from the study "Can atmospheric chemistry deposition schemes reliably simulate stomatal ozone flux across global land covers and climates?""Jülich DATA2025Earth and Environmental SciencesEmmerichs, TamaraTamaraEmmerichsMax Planck Institute for MeteorologyEmberson, Lisa DianneLisa DianneEmbersonMao, HuitingZhang, LeimingHuang, MinMinHuangGerosa, GiacomoGiacomoGerosaGuaita, Pierluigi RenanPierluigi RenanGuaitaBetancourt, ClaraClaraBetancourtKoren, GerbrandGerbrandKorenRan, LimeiWong, Anthony Y. H.Anthony Y. H.WongMamun, AbdullaAbdullaMamun2025-11-241581248710.5281/zenodo.158124871.0Over the past few decades, ozone risk assessments for vegetation have evolved two methods based on stomatal O3 flux. However, substantial uncertainties remain in accurately simulating these fluxes. In the study by Emmerichs et al. ("Can atmospheric chemistry deposition schemes reliably simulate stomatal ozone flux across global land covers and climates?", Biogeosciences 2025)  investigate stomatal O3 fluxes across various land cover types worldwide simulated by six established deposition models. This dataset contains the main model output from WebDO3SE (csv data per station) and simulated sunlit and total stomatal conductance from the TEMIR, ZHANG, CMAQ and MESSy models (xlsx data file).